Social Exchange Theory and Employee Retention in Banking Sector

 Social Exchange Theory and Employee Retention in  Banking Sector

Social Exchange Theory (SET) offers a conceptual framework for understanding the intricacies of interactions, namely those occurring between employers and employees. Regarding employee retention, SET recommends that individuals make rational decisions by carefully considering the pros and cons of staying with or leaving a company. Based on this idea, employees are more inclined to remain with a company if they perceive that the advantages, such as compensation, perks, job stability, and opportunities for career progression, surpass the disadvantages, such as heavy workload, stress, lack of acknowledgment, and limited growth prospects.

The emphasis placed by SET on reciprocity and resource sharing between employees and employers is of paramount importance in the context of employee retention. Based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET), individuals participate in a reciprocal exchange wherein they seek equitable treatment and remuneration for their contributions, with the aim of optimizing their outcomes within social interactions. This suggests that employees who perceive themselves as valued and receive appropriate remuneration for their efforts are more likely to exhibit higher levels of commitment and retention within an organization. However, this also implies that employees may experience a sense of being undervalued and are more inclined to resign if they perceive that their efforts are not being remunerated equitably.

Moreover, SET acknowledges that the nature of the relationship between employees and their firms has a substantial impact on retention outcomes. When employees have mutual respect, trust, and support from their employers, they are more inclined to develop a strong dedication to the firm and its goals. The interpersonal aspect of Social and Emotional Learning (SET) underscores the significance of establishing a productive work environment characterized by opportunities for employee engagement and participation, leadership that provides support, and transparent communication. Conversely, a deficient corporate culture, unfair treatment, or a dearth of trust might diminish workers' dedication and increase their likelihood of intending to depart.

While the Social Exchange Theory (SET) offers valuable insights into the factors influencing employee retention, it has faced criticism due to its narrow focus on economic transactions and its assumption of rational decision-making. Critics argue that SET fails to consider the complex socio-psychological factors like as social identity, emotions, and personal beliefs that influence employee behaviour. In addition to tangible advantages, employees may exhibit loyalty towards a firm as a result of emotional connections, a sense of camaraderie, or a collective dedication to the organization's objectives and values. Moreover, irrational factors such as familial obligations, professional aspirations, or interpersonal dynamics with colleagues can influence an employee's choice to remain in their current position.

Furthermore, SET frequently oversimplifies the intricacies of power dynamics and inequalities within organizations. While the theory suggests that workers and employers engage in voluntary transactions, in reality, employees may encounter obstacles in their ability to negotiate for advantageous terms or voice their concerns due to power imbalances and institutional constraints. For instance, those employed in precarious positions or belonging to marginalized communities may have a sense of compulsion to persist in their profession despite poor circumstances due to limited alternative opportunities or apprehension regarding potential termination. This critique underscores the need of considering power dynamics and broader socioeconomic variables when addressing employee retention.

Despite these concerns, the Social Exchange Theory (SET) remains a valuable paradigm for understanding the intricacies of employee retention and formulating effective organizational tactics. Organisations have the potential to enhance their retention strategies by recognizing the significance of equitable treatment, mutually beneficial relationships, and trust in cultivating employee engagement. This may involve implementing protocols and guidelines that promote fairness, transparency, and employee engagement, while also providing opportunities for career advancement and advancement. Organizations can benefit from adopting a holistic approach that surpasses mere financial considerations and acknowledges the complex nature of employee experiences and motivations.

Social Exchange Theory offers valuable insights into the factors that drive employee retention by emphasizing the importance of reciprocal connections, perceived fairness, and trust in shaping employee behaviour. However, it has faced criticism for its limited emphasis on logical decision-making and financial transactions, as it fails to consider the intricate power dynamics inside companies and socio-psychological factors. However, firms can enhance their retention strategies by integrating SET insights with a more profound understanding of employee motivations and experiences, so promoting both organizational performance and employee well-being.

Application on Social Exchange Theory and Employee Retention in Banking Sector 

Adhering to this idea, individuals form partnerships that optimise advantages and minimise costs. Regarding banking, consumers strive to decrease costs such as fees, waiting periods, and transaction processing time while increasing the benefits they receive from their bank such as interest rates, convenient services, and financial guidance.

Financial institutions seek to achieve profitability by concurrently acquiring and retaining customers through the provision of competitive products and services. They invest on cultivating a relationship based on trust and loyalty with their clientele through reliability, efficient service, and tailored interactions. Furthermore, companies employ strategies like as incentives programmes and loyalty plans in order to encourage repeat patronage.

The evaluation of banking connections by clients is contingent upon the perceived value derived from the transaction. Positive interactions, contentment, and trust have the potential to foster stronger interpersonal connections and potentially enhance client loyalty. Conversely, adverse encounters, such as inadequate support or unanticipated expenses, have the potential to undermine trust and incentivize customers to seek other alternatives.

The significance of reciprocity in banking partnerships is underscored by Social Exchange Theory. Consumers may experience a sense of duty to reciprocate the benefits by maintaining larger accounts, availing themselves of additional services, or promoting their bank to others. Similarly, financial institutions incentivize and tailor their offerings to devoted clientele through the provision of enhanced services and advantages.

References 

Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Liu, Y., & Glaister, K. W. (2016). Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention. International business review, 25(1), 66-75. 

Ahmad, A. F. (2022). The influence of interpersonal conflict, job stress, and work life balance on employee turnover intention. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 4(2), 1-14. 

Al Mamun, C. A., & Hasan, M. N. (2017). Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: A conceptual view. Problems and Perspectives in Management, (15, Iss. 1), 63-71. 

Ali, B. J., & Anwar, G. (2021). An empirical study of employees’ motivation and its influence job satisfaction. Ali, BJ, & Anwar, G.(2021). An Empirical Study of Employees’ Motivation and its Influence Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management, 5(2), 21-30. 

Al-Suraihi, W. A., Samikon, S. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2021). Employee Turnover Causes, Importance and Retention Strategies. European Journal of Business and Management Research (EJBMR). Ashton, A. S. (2018). How human resources management best practice influence employee satisfaction and job retention in the Thai hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 17(2), 175- 199. 

Narayanan, A., Rajithakumar, S., & Menon, M. (2019). Talent management and employee retention: An integrative research framework. Human Resource Development Review, 18(2), 228-247. 

Choy, M. W., & Kamoche, K. (2021). Identifying stabilizing and destabilizing factors of job change: A qualitative study of employee retention in the Hong Kong travel agency industry. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(10), 1375-1388.